A lot of people have a lot of problems believing in the Christian faith. This is
not a modern phenomenon; it has always been the case. It is today, it was in
medieval times, it was in the first century AD or, so as not to upset the secular
atheists, the first century ‘CE’ (Common Era)
People have issues not only in general but in particular - in particular articles or
tenets of Christian doctrine or teaching. And one of those particular articles of
Christian belief – probably the greatest one, and certainly one of the greatest
problems people have in believing – is the belief that Jesus was both human
and divine; that is to say that he was at one and the same time both a man and
God – God who created the world and all life itself. But even if we believe that
there is such a thing, or, rather, person, as God, how can such a thing possibly
be?
To the modern mind, steeped as it is for so many ordinary people, in notions,
usually rather vague, of Evolutionism or Darwinism as the explanation for our
existence; or to the non-believing professional scientists with their very
prescriptive laws of materialistic science which determine what they will and
will not allow as evidence, the very idea seems quite absurd. So why even
bother with it?
Well, setting aside for a moment the fact that not only have millions and
millions of people for the past 2000 years, including very intelligent men and
women, and even Nobel Prize winning scientists believed it, I would have to
admit that the idea is extremely puzzling. How could an ordinary man,
however unsurpassed his moral teaching, however wonderful his character,
however unique his suitability as a role model for humanity, also be God?
Ironically, one of the first major heresies or erroneous beliefs within the early
Church was the belief that Jesus was so amazing in every way that he could not
possibly have really been human; he just gave the appearance of being so. But
today the reverse is the case: how could an ordinary man possibly be divine?
Now some will argue that those poor, simple minded, uneducated,
unscientifically qualified first century Christians were simply emotionally,
psychologically, and intellectually overwhelmed by the personality and
charisma of Jesus. As many people at the time said, ‘No one ever taught like
him.’ Or again, ‘No one ever did miracles on the scale he does them.’
And to support their argument those same people will point today to the
naivety and gullibility of the thousands who are taken in by some manipulative
US TV evangelists who have been shown to be quacks and charlatans.
But there is all the difference in the world between Jesus and such men: Jesus
did not wear crocodile skin shoes and live in mansions, whilst those charlatans
who have died did not rise to life again three days later – appearing on one
occasion to over 500 people at the same time - as proof that everything he
taught and claimed and did and promised could indeed be believed!
More importantly, not only did Jesus himself claim to be God – something no
other person in history (who was not known to be either evil or stark raving
bonkers) has ever claimed, he also claimed to be the God who created all life
and whose purpose in becoming human was to save humanity from its Self.
And that – his claim to be God - as history relates, was the reason why he was
executed – for blasphemy, precisely for claiming to be God.
As C.S. Lewis so famously put it, ‘Either Jesus was mad, bad, or God: the
evidence leaves us no other choice.’
Of course, some will argue about the reliability of the evidence for all this – his
teaching, his miracles, his claims, and of course his resurrection. But even
atheist historians and archaeologists will admit that the literary and
archaeological evidence for Christianity’s claims are second to none when
compared with the then contemporary events, but also for events of the next
1500 or more years!
Richard Dawkins’ caricatures of Christianity are just that: caricatures. Even his
sincere atheist colleagues are embarrassed by them. (I did hear one wonderful
story of an atheist scientist who came to faith in Christ because he realised
that Dawkins’ caricatures were not the real thing and because there were far
too many bright people who did believe Christianity, many of whom were
scientists and some Nobel Prize winning ones!)
As with pretty much everything in life, rational people believe something
because the quality of the evidence convinces them to put their faith in it even
if they do not fully understand it. For example, I don’t fully understand the
theory of flight, but I am happy to fly in a plane. I don’t understand gravity, but
I was happy to jump out of them as long as my parachute was attached …. Oh,
and my reserve!
I’d like to give you just three principal reasons or pieces of evidence that have
convinced me that Jesus was both human and divine, both man and God.
The first is philosophical: but please don’t be scared; Year 3 two years ago at
Brenchley and Matfield Primary (that’s 7 and 8 year olds) got this pretty much
straightaway. We do have high hopes for some in that year group but it does
remind me of Jesus’ words that it is children who understand the mysteries of
God and His kingdom so much more easily than sophisticated grownups.
If you were a wizard or a witch and could magic anything at all – I did say Year
3 remember – and you wanted to know, because you really loved them, what
it was like to think like a rabbit and feel like a rabbit and truly experience what
it was to be a rabbit, how could you best do that? Don’t worry, to avoid
embarrassing you I won’t put anyone on the spot to answer that this morning.
And so, yes, if you are God, and you love the human race you created and you
want not only to communicate with them in an unthreatening way but also be
as them, exemplify human life, and then save them, how best might you
accomplish that? Is there not a very compelling love AND logic in God’s
incarnation, in choosing, in one of his forms of being God, to become human?
But moving quickly on to my second piece of evidence: how did it happen that
the God-man Jesus came about? Often wrongly referred to as ‘the virgin birth’,
the ‘virginal conception’ of Jesus is the unique and only way that, biologically,
it could have happened. And the point is this. God’s Spirit, not Joseph’s seed,
bearing the Second Person of the Holy Trinity, the Son, combines with Mary’s
egg so that no new person is created: instead, the Second Person of the Trinity
embraces and assumes his humanity from her and is born as the infant Jesus.
Those who suggest that Joseph had been intimate with Mary beforehand or
that Mary might not have been the innocent the New Testament records her
being are simply woefully ignorant of Jewish society and culture of that time.
My third piece of evidence is what Jesus had to say about himself and how he
proved his claims about himself to be true. By his teaching and by his miracles
Jesus proved his direct and indirect claims to be the two things which got him
executed - that he had both authority over all life and that he could forgive
peoples’ sins. And of course the supreme piece of proof he gave was his
promised rising from death to new life again, the evidence for which is
thoroughly compelling but will never be sufficient for those who choose not to
believe it.
Does it matter? Does it matter that we believe that Jesus was God incarnate?
Well the writers of the New Testament are quite adamant that it does. St. Paul
wrote (Romans 10:v9) that such a belief is required if a person is to be saved
and reconciled to God; while St. John provides a sobering warning that anyone
who denies Christ’s true humanity as well as his deity is lost to God of their
own volition.
Does it matter today? Well if what you want is just a moral code for life, then
perhaps no. But if you are honest enough to admit that you cannot live up to
that moral code and realise that, without faith in Jesus Christ - God’s chosen
unique yet universal way to salvation - God cannot accept you, then yes indeed
it does matter.
Or if all you want from the Church is a cosy little group that leaves you feeling
good about the world and about yourself, then probably no. But if you are
troubled by bad habits, a bad conscience, and, yes, the other side of death, and
want to be saved from these, then yes indeed it does matter.
Or if you simply want a cultural or academic interest in some aspect of
Christianity such as music, architecture, church history, or New Testament
Greek, then, no, it probably doesn’t matter. But if you want to become an
effective disciple of his and live not just the comfortable and comforting parts
– not ‘just up for the craic’, as the Irish would say - but the serving and
suffering aspects too, then yes indeed it most certainly does matter because as
Jesus himself said, ‘Without me you can do nothing’.
Jesus embraced humanity because he wants to embrace each one of us now
and for eternity, each person he brought into being: but we can only know that
embrace and respond wholeheartedly to it once we know and believe who he
truly is, God himself who became one of us in order that you and I could be
with him for ever. All the while we doubt him, doubt that he is whom he
claimed to be, our hearts will be deficient in Christian love, our minds short-
changed of the truth, our discipleship ineffective.
He will not force his love upon us because that is not the way of love. Instead,
he leaves the choice up to each one of us. I pray that if you have not already
done so you will choose wisely and open or reopen your life to him: he is
always ready and longing to forgive and to come in.
No comments:
Post a Comment